Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ 12/13 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]

Re: Downtown Parking study session

From: domainremoved <Adina>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:22:43 -0700

p.s. Another idea that can be helpful in using downtown parking space
efficiently. The ECR/Downtown Plan already recommends unbundled
parking for residential developments. Other cities are starting to
enable this approach for commercial developments as well. If a
tenant uses less parking than average, those parking spaces can be
made available back to the public pool.

Menlo Park already recommends shared parking for neighbors with
complementary hours of use, but this needs to be worked out in
advance. With unbundled parking, the tenant can lease what they need,
and make unused parking available at a later date. If this is not
done, it is harder for the city to seek to renegotiate access to
stranded, underutilized private parking.

This approach has been recently included in policies in City of San
Mateo and Sunnyvale as they seek to make efficient use of parking
going forward.

Thanks for your consideration,

- Adina

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Adina Levin <aldeivnian_at_(domainremoved)
> Dear Council Members,
> This note is in regard to this evening's study session on downtown parking.
> As a member of the Transportation Commission, I am not writing on
> behalf of the commission, but reporting on recommendation that the
> Commission made in the context of the Capital Improvement Plan.
> The ECR/Downtown Specific Plan allows for parking garages, which would
> facilitate more efficient use of smaller properties, where it is
> inefficient to include parking onsite. With regard to financing, the
> plan recommends a combination of in-lieu fees and public-private
> partnership (pages F18 and on)
> The Transportation Commission recommended that in exploring the
> financing of structured parking, the City should broaden the scope
> along the lines of recent parking policy adopted in City of San Mateo,
> as well as effective practices in cities including Boulder, Austin,
> and Portland.
> These cities enable in-lieue fees to be used for transportation demand
> management investments to reduce solo driving to and from downtown,
> such as transit passes, shuttles, zipcars and bikeshare (so that
> people who use transit can do mid-day errands), and other such
> programs. The policies in these cities recognize that the city has
> an important role to play in facilitating access to a thriving
> downtown, however this access is not always in the form of driving and
> parking.
> By reducing the share of solo driving, Menlo Park can moderate the
> need to build expensive parking structures, reduce the traffic burden
> that could be caused by more people downtown, and create a more
> pleasant, walkable, bikeable place. Reducing vehicle miles traveled
> also helps Menlo Park achieve the city's greenhouse gas reduction
> goals.
> It is good to see the council moving forward to further the goals of
> the ECR/Downtown Plan. I encourage the Council to adopt strategies
> that improve access to downtown in ways that are financially efficient
> and also further the goals of environmental sustainability and quality
> of life.
> Thanks,
> - Adina
> Adina Levin
> Menlo Park
> p.s.
> Here are links to staff reports regarding the City of San Mateo plan
> describing the ability to use in-lieu fees for vehicle trip reduction
> (search for TDM in the document).
> http://www.cityofsanmateo.org/DocumentCenter/View/43529
Received on Tue Mar 24 2015 - 16:18:19 PDT

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]

Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)